I read somewhere that the Soviets sometimes would have enemies of the
state committed to asylums for some kind of psychiatric disease:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
It even goes on to this day:
In modern Russia, human rights activists also face the threat of
psychiatric diagnosis as a means of political repression.
Most convenient diagnosis was "sluggish schizophrenia":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
It was defined as a special form of the illness which
supposedly affected only the person's social behavior, with no
influence on other traits: "most frequently, ideas about a
'struggle for truth and justice' are formed by personalities
with a paranoid structure", according to Moscow Serbsky
Institute professors.[1] The diagnostic criteria were vague
enough to be applied to nearly anyone, as desired. The
dissidents were forcibly hospitalized and subjected to
treatments which included antipsychotic drugs and
electroconvulsive therapy.
...
The incidence of sluggish schizophrenia increased because,
according to Snezhnevsky and his colleagues, patients with
this diagnosis were capable of socially functioning almost
normally.[8] Their symptoms could resemble those of a neurosis
or paranoia.[8] Patients with paranoid symptoms retained
insight into their condition, but overestimated their
significance and had grandiose ideas of reforming society.[8]
Sluggish schizophrenia could have such symptoms as "reform
delusions", "perseverance" and "struggle for the truth".[8] As
V.D. Stayzhkin reported, Snezhnevsky diagnosed a reform
delusion in every case where a patient "develops a new
principle of human knowledge, drafts an ideal of human
happiness or other projects for the benefit of mankind".
Combined with the Stasi policy of undermining:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
By the 1970s, the Stasi had decided that methods of overt
persecution which had been employed up to that time, such as
arrest and torture, were too crude and obvious. It was
realised that psychological harassment was far less likely to
be recognised for what it was, so its victims, and their
supporters, were less likely to be provoked into active
resistance, given that they would often not be aware of the
source of their problems, or even its exact nature. Zersetzung
was designed to side-track and "switch off" perceived enemies
so that they would lose the will to continue any
"inappropriate" activities.
Tactics employed under zersetzung generally involved the
disruption of the victim's private or family life. This often
included breaking into homes and messing with the contents -
moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing
pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with
another. Other practices included mysterious phone calls or
unnecessary deliveries, even including sending a vibrator to a
target's wife. Usually victims had no idea the Stasi were
responsible. Many thought they were losing their minds, and
mental breakdowns and suicide could result.
...one could virtually guarantee that the person would fall into the
trap diagnosis and that one could involuntarily commit them.
Anyway, despite all this, one thing I noticed amongst people inclined
to anti-authoritarianism, is that they often seem to resent (perhaps
due to absence), hate, or at least mistrust the authority figure from
their childhood. This is usually, but not always, the father figure.
Anyway, here's an interesting modern take on this:
http://www.madinamerica.com/
20120921
Repression Therapy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Obligatory reference:
"you're not paranoid if they're really out to get you"
Post a Comment