skip to main | skip to sidebar

H/B Implications Watch

Philosophical Fodder. Each post here has serious implications for privacy & freedom, logic & common sense.

20100419

Which would you rather lose?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Flattr this blog

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Followers

  • 350.org
  • Irrepressible
  • Donut Watch
  • Nick Gisburne
  • Call for Action
  • Haven/Bastion
  • My Name Is Me
  • Free Range Kids
  • Libertarian Party
  • Keith Olbermann
  • Reason Magazine
  • Zero State Project
  • Defend Innovation
  • Altruists International
  • Amnesty International
  • Information Liberation
  • Freedom to Photograph
  • National Rifle Association
  • Rational Response Squad
  • American Civil Liberties Union
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation
  • Fully Informed Jury Association
  • Foundation for Individual Rights in Education

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (73)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2014 (327)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (25)
    • ►  August (42)
    • ►  July (37)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (32)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (41)
  • ►  2013 (608)
    • ►  December (100)
    • ►  November (65)
    • ►  October (53)
    • ►  September (46)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (49)
    • ►  June (87)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (30)
    • ►  March (70)
    • ►  February (60)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2012 (552)
    • ►  December (43)
    • ►  November (43)
    • ►  October (68)
    • ►  September (60)
    • ►  August (36)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (41)
    • ►  May (60)
    • ►  April (48)
    • ►  March (52)
    • ►  February (47)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ►  2011 (574)
    • ►  December (30)
    • ►  November (40)
    • ►  October (64)
    • ►  September (98)
    • ►  August (77)
    • ►  July (59)
    • ►  June (89)
    • ►  May (53)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ▼  2010 (369)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (57)
    • ►  June (35)
    • ►  May (140)
    • ▼  April (67)
      • Oklahoma, what have you done?
      • Tough, Controversial New Legislation Scares Many i...
      • Make Mine Freedom (1948)
      • TAXES, TAXES, AND MORE TAXES!
      • TSA Thugs Lose Case Against Woman with Applesauce
      • Kids beware: your ISP has rated this website "PG"
      • DMCA abuse extends to Twitter posts
      • Canada's Heritage Minister ready to bring back DMC...
      • In praise of SFWA's Grievance Committee
      • Nina Paley passes Netflix DRM and thousands of dol...
      • Protect your copyrights, boycott DRM-locked platforms
      • Best copyright policies in the world? Try India
      • What Drives Motivation in the Modern Workplace?
      • Screw you, Internet? Digital Economy bill passes i...
      • US government finally admits most piracy estimates...
      • Amazing rats
      • Earth Day
      • Praising, cursing ACTA: reactions roll in
      • When Copyright Goes Bad (English)
      • ACTA arrives
      • GoogleSharing privacy tool
      • Food for The Eagle
      • Be Counted
      • parkinson's = leech
      • The Letter “Z” Will Be Removed from the English Al...
      • RIAA Wants Gov. to Delete Your Illegal Downloads
      • Netflix Agrees To Delay Distribution of New Releas...
      • voter turnout
      • Congratulations all around!
      • Noah, the unabridged version.
      • Children With a Rare Genetic Syndrome Have no Raci...
      • 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality ...
      • The red state ripoff
      • Fake porn draws criticism
      • follow the curve
      • Irony
      • Which would you rather lose?
      • Big Content's dystopian wish-list for the US gov't...
      • Copying Is Not Theft - Best!
      • Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
      • Peter Watts may serve two years for failing to pro...
      • Dr Peter Watts, Canadian science fiction writer, b...
      • School IT allegedly took "thousands" of pics in we...
      • Pa. School Faces FBI Probe, Lawsuit, for Using Web...
      • "40 dumbest tax-day <tea party> signs"
      • Format shifting dead trees: can e-book piracy be e...
      • Council to ban the word 'obesity' - so fat childre...
      • Scientists say free will probably doesn't exist, b...
      • Taxes for the rest of us...
      • Who's #1 in broadband?
      • Girl claims injuries from price scanner
      • German Catholics Blow Their Top Over Magazine Cover
      • 2000 pound Marijuana case dismissed
      • Collateral Murder
      • Earth Day and the Polling of America, 2010: Me Fir...
      • Hillary Clinton On The Supreme Court?
      • Facts About Bottled Water
      • 7,500 shoppers unknowingly sold their souls
      • Richard Dawkins: I will arrest Pope Benedict XVI
      • Maine Commission Moves to Ban Gender Specific Bath...
      • "Convenience" Charges
      • Wis. prosecutor: Teachers risk arrest over new sex...
      • FCC Loses Key Ruling on `Net Neutrality'
      • The Third Principle of Sentient Life
      • Tampon-makers can't mention the V-word. Period.
      • 'Rape simulator' game goes viral amid calls for ce...
      • Our stand for digital due process
    • ►  March (2)
  • ►  2009 (116)
    • ►  December (28)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (2)
  • ►  2008 (487)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (48)
    • ►  June (74)
    • ►  April (38)
    • ►  March (177)
    • ►  February (59)
    • ►  January (52)
  • ►  2007 (673)
    • ►  December (75)
    • ►  November (85)
    • ►  October (58)
    • ►  September (80)
    • ►  August (45)
    • ►  July (140)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (63)
    • ►  February (52)
    • ►  January (58)
  • ►  2006 (29)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  February (11)
  • ►  2005 (215)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (35)
    • ►  April (56)
    • ►  March (38)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (36)
  • ►  2004 (332)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (53)
    • ►  June (38)
    • ►  May (40)
    • ►  April (27)
    • ►  March (35)
    • ►  February (28)